The Tangled Trouble With Rapunzel

Byron Howard, Nathan Greno Direct Film Developed By Glen Keane

5 Comments
Join the Conversation
a scene from Rapunzel/Tangled - copyright 2010 Walt Disney Company
a scene from Rapunzel/Tangled - copyright 2010 Walt Disney Company
Disney's Rapunzel (now renamed Tangled) has had a long and messy history. Animation Boy™ runs down the CGI animated film's difficult history.

Turning Rapunzel into an animated film should have been a slam-dunk for Disney: some of their most beloved movies – Snow White, The Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, Sleeping Beauty – have been based on classic fairy tales. Plus, the Disney Princesses line of merchandise has been a stunning cash cow for the company, earning $3.4 billion in 2006 alone.

However, acclaimed animator Glen Keane has struggled for many years to bring Rapunzel to the big screen. Now, after health issues sidelined his directorial debut, Keane may watch his dream turn into a seemingly market research-mauled monster named Tangled.

What happened?

How Glen Keane Developed a CGI Rapunzel For Disney Animation

The son of Family Circus creator Bil Keane (he inspired the character of Billy in the long-running comic strip), Glen Keane joined Disney right after graduating from Cal Arts in 1974. Mentored by legendary animator Ollie Johnston, Keane swiftly became one of Disney's top artists, and "animation's version of a rock star." Audiences can view his distinctive touch on characters like The Little Mermaid's Ariel, Beast from Beauty and the Beast plus the title characters from Aladdin, Pocahontas and Tarzan.

Despite his mastery of traditional animation, Keane was an early fan of CGI. In 1983, he assisted Lasseter with the stunning test reel for a proposed Disney adaptation of Where the Wild Things Are, and worked on countless scenes that mixed cel animation and CGI: the ballroom scene in Beauty and the Beast, Pocahontas' swirling leaves and ultimately, the cyborg Long John Silver in Treasure Planet.

When Keane finally decided to submit his first feature proposal, a retelling of the classic Grimm fairy tale Rapunzel, Walt Disney Feature Animation head David Stainton and Disney CEO Michael Eisner had two conditions.

First, it had to be a 'fractured fairy tale,' much like DreamWorks' Shrek, giving the classic story a hip, modern spin. Second, Disney brass decided that cel animation was toast – due to the success of CGI movies from Pixar, DreamWorks and Fox/Blue Sky – so the film, now called Rapunzel Unbraided, would be computer generated.

Rapunzel Unbraided: "a Film of Astonishing Beauty."

"That they'd ask me to make it a computer animated film . . . I hadn't expected that," Keane told a 2005 Siggraph conference. "After all, I was the guy who kept saying 'I'll kill any person that tries to take a pencil out of my hand.' Now I have to eat those words."

Rising to the challenge, Keane tried to bring the flowing beauty of oil painting to the CGI realm, Working with CGI director Kevin Geiger and artist Lisa Keene, he developed a visual style heavily influenced by French rococo painters like Jean-Honoré Fragonard.

"Rapunzel Unbraided has to be a film of astonishing beauty," Keane told Siggraph in 2005. "It's the story of a girl who is swept up to fulfill the destiny of another. And – in doing this – she discovers her own."

Due to a 2006 revolt by former Disney board members Stanley Gold and Roy E. Disney, Keane's former protegé John Lasseter, became his new boss.

Despite saying, "I can't remember ever seeing a movie that has such a powerful beginning as Rapunzel," Lasseter immediately wanted to make it a more classic fairy tale. Working out a compromise, Lasseter and Keane lost the Unbraided and made Rapunzel (voiced by Mandy Moore) a more modern heroine, matched with a charming bandit named Flynn Ryder (Zachary Levi). Dean Wellins (The Iron Giant) signed on as co-director.

"When the kingdom’s most wanted (and most charming) bandit is forced to make a deal with the golden-haired, tower-bound teen, the unlikely duo sets off on a hilarious, hair-raising escapade complete with a super-cop horse, an over-protective chameleon, and a gruff gang of pub thugs," claimed Disney's official plot synopsis. "The handsome prince Flynn Ryder has sailed through life by looking good, talking fast and being lucky – but when he picks a mysterious and secluded tower as his hideout, it looks like his luck may have run out.

"Flynn is knocked out, tied up and taken hostage by the beautiful and feisty Rapunzel, whose 70 feet of magical, golden hair, which she can use like powerful tentacles, isn’t even the strangest thing about her. Locked-away and lonely, Rapunzel sees this smooth-talking bandit as her ticket out of the tower. One comical kidnapping and a bit of blackmail later, Flynn and his curious captor are off on one of the most tangled tales ever told."

Keane Steps Down as Director, and Disney Market Researchers Ask, 'Who is Rapunzel?'

In 2008, Keane was forced to relinquish the director's chair due to some "non-life threatening health issues." Bolt co-director Byron Howard replaced him, and supplanted Wellins with Nathan Greno. Keane stayed on as executive producer and animation director for Rapunzel.

Then there was The Princess and the Frog: Disney's much-heralded return to cel animation needed 8 weeks to turn a profit, despite glowing reviews and impressive buzz. All of a sudden, an animated princess movie based on a classic fairy tale no longer seemed like a sure thing. Disney executives believed that audiences stayed away because they thought The Princess and the Frog was a 'girlie film.'

"Based upon the response from fans and critics, we believe (The Princess and the Frog's box office) would have been higher if it wasn't prejudged by its title," Pixar co-founder Ed Catmull told the LA Times.

Adding fuel to the fire, Disney's market researchers reported that, outside of North America and Germany, no one actually knew the tale of Rapunzel. Renaming the film Tangled and basing the story more about the Flynn character, the Mouse House believed, would remove the 'chick flick' associations and make it more palatable to males.

Dominic von Riedemann, by Brian Tao

Dominic von Riedemann - Dominic is the Animated Film Feature Writer, and winner of 11 Suite 101 Editors' Choice Awards.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 4+0?

Comments

Mar 30, 2010 3:29 PM
Guest :
I find that title, “Tangled,” disrespectful to not only the Grimm Brother’s title, but to Walt Disney as well. Because that is not what Walt Disney would do when he adapts fairy tales into animated movies. Just because fairy tales that have girlish titles does NOT make it a girlish story. Those people, who complain about fairy tale titles being too girlish, need to understand that those story titles being too girlish happens to be written by MEN before we are even born. Also, they need to understand that they do not write stories just for girls or boys, they write for families to enjoy, learn, and love. I even love the title logo that Disney created for “Rapunzel,” and now they want to change it to “Tangled?” That title does not make any sense, and it is misleading. If they ever do change the title from “Rapunzel” to “Tangled,” I would find Disney’s next CG movie a flop. But, if they leave the title, “Rapunzel,” the way it is, and the title logo that Disney created as well, then I would have high confidence that Disney’s next CG movie could be a huge success. So I say to Disney, “In the name of Floyd Norman, a retired Disney and Pixar animator, and Walt Disney’s ghost, I demand that you change that dreadful title back to “Rapunzel” at once, or else you will all become a disgrace to Walt Disney forever. And you will fall to DreamWorks Animation forever more.”

I understand why they called it "Tangled." Not just to get the boys well entertained, but there are scenes in the synopsis that have created an example of the word "tangled," such as the bandit, named Flynn Rider, who gets "tangled" with Rapunzel after she made a deal for her freedom. Flynn and Rapunzel's romance can be "tangled." Even Rapunzel's hair can be "tangled" as well famous for her 70-feet of golden hair or blonde either way.

I watched the teaser trailer of Disney's Tangled, it is very cool, but did not show the name of the story. Which means that Disney COULD, but that depends on their version of the story perhaps, change the title back, even though changing the title from "Rapunzel" to "Tangled" is official. However, on the leaked trailer before the teaser trailer that I have watched as well, it has revealed the title based on Disney's title change. It is really cool, but I do not have the taste buds on the new title that Disney made. In fact, I love the title logo that Disney made for Rapunzel; it is very beautiful, and entertaining. It makes me want to see it so much. But since they changed the title from "Rapunzel" to "Tangled," perhaps I could see it, but I would find it a flop.

To tell you the truth, I find that title, "Tangled," misleading, funny, but misleading. To me it is like watching a parody of Shrek, Hoodwinked, and Happily N'ever After put together. But I understand that Disney is sticking to one fairy tale by the Grimm Brothers, but I am afraid what they are doing is disrespectful to not only the Grimm Brothers, but to Walt Disney as well, because Walt Disney would never change titles on fairy tales. He probably does not care about people, like boys, who complain about fairy tales with girlish titles being too girlish, the only thing that Disney cares about is not only making dreams come true for FAMILIES by adapting fairy tales into animated movies, but to fulfill famous fairy tale writers who has shaped the world of entertainment for every family around the world.

Also, those boys need to "Dig a Little Deeper (according to the song from "The Princess and the Frog")," on the story of fairy tales with girlish titles, because what if Disney arranges the story to make it more interesting than typical? Maybe then, even though fairy tales have girlish titles, but it can have an excellent story for not just girls or boys, but for FAMILIES to enjoy, learn, and love. The only way that fairy tales could be too girlish, including the title, is if the story is too girlish. But through Disney's experience when it comes to adapting fairy tales into animated movies with girlish titles, they are all FAMILY. That is what makes Disney very special.

By the way, I have no problem with "The Princess and the Frog," that I saw. I give that movie infinite A+, especially when Dr. Facilier is a fun villain, evil, but fun. But I can say this, if changing the title is what Disney wants to do to get the boys well entertained along with the girls, it is their movie. But I have a little bit of a bad feeling that their next CG movie could be a flop based on the title change. But if they decided to change the title back to the way it is, then it could be a financial success...I hope.

One more thing, it is not the title that bothers boys, it is the story itself that is not strong enough. Some times, Disney probably accidentally made the story a little too girlish for “The Princess and the Frog,” than trying to make it a family type, especially when some of the characters that Disney has created are not receiving enough roles. My advice for Disney is that the next time they want to adapt fairy tales into animated movies; they should try to make the story strong to fit to the title based on the fairy tale, instead of changing the title.
May 28, 2010 2:03 PM
Guest :
I think it's foolish to change a possible Disney classic to something "hip" and "modern" like the way they did to Rapunzel. Peer pressure never works. Walt Disney was peer pressured into not making Snow White, but he made it anyways and look where it got him! Maybe Disney needs a new fairy tale like Rapunzel. Princess and the Frog might have been the Sleeping Beauty of our generation, but Rapunzel...erm, I mean Tangled, could be the next Little Mermaid. It could be something that truly re-inspires everyone with the beauty of fairy tales and not a male-dominant society. I don't agree with how the two directors want to change everythign to make it male-orientated. They were never part of the company as long as Keane has been nor have they worked on fairy tale based films. It's just not right.
May 31, 2010 2:10 PM
Guest :
If Anything...

I think they should use `Tangled`as a sub-name, kind of like Pirates of the Caribbean: the Black Pearl, that way people would know that there is more to the story then just `Rapunzel,Rapunzel let down your hair`, but at the same time i keeps it`s fairy tale roots and in addition is also respectful to Walt Disney and the Grimm Brothers, like it could be something like `Rapunzel: the tangled years` or `Rapunzel: A tangled tale of epic proportions` or `Rapunzel: prepared to get tangled`

the options are endless, and in my opinion it`s a very ideal compromise.
Jan 15, 2011 2:35 AM
Guest :
I can understand the reason for the title change, and Disney not wanting to take chances after the title "The Princess and the Frog" compromised that movie's performance. Titles can make a big difference to box office success and girly-sounding names like "Pollyanna" can mean box office failure, no matter how good the movie is or what rave reviews it gets. "Pollyanna" had both, but Disney believed the title was its death warrant.

Moreover, Disney was probably getting nervous that fairy tales were going out of favour at the box office. This led to the failure of Sleeping Beauty in 1959, and it called a halt on fairy tales at Disney studios until The Little Mermaid in 1988. Disney wouldn't want to risk history repeating itself.

However I can also see the points of the people who disagree with the "Tangled" title. "Rapunzel" automatically tells you what the movie is about, "Tangled" does not do so as well. Maybe Disney should have combined them; in some countries it has the title "Rapunzel: A Tangled Tale". Or something else altogether, such as "Rapunzel and the Rogue". Boys wouldn't be bashful at going to see a rogue, although they know girly-sounding Rapunzel is going to be there too.
Feb 5, 2011 1:32 PM
Guest :
I watch the movie tangled trouble with Rapunzel .I think should make tangled 2 ???????????:)I think the second should go like this. When life with Flynn and Rapunzel was getting difficult because of all the change in their life that they are not use to .And Rapunzel was going to tell the king and queen her parent about the secret that she had the gift of haling people with her saliva or cry on tem . well that Flynn and max the horse with the man was chasing the twin brother and one of the man got by one of the brother. Flynn rush back to the kingdom when Flynn got to castle rapunzel finish tell them about it .in the first time in along time she help the men she sing the song spite on him held him . well the song somehow the mother gothen came back to life she look around and do an evil laugh she goes in the tower to find out how she came back. The twin brothers run in n to the tower and claim it to hide form the soilder, when gothen saw them she know right away she could team up with them to get revain over Flynn and rapunzel of all they did to her to . so on the way to the kingdom they heard about the magic of the picenss. Know she want her back she well do any thing to get her back.so they forgerout an plan to get her back. Gothen and the twin brother found a new place to hide here . somehowthey lead her to the hideing placenot in the old tower.they found some how and they kill gothen for real .life got easyer for flynn and rapunzeland live happey ever after
5 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement