Cartoons Cause Violence?

Seattle Children's Hospital Study Links Aggressive Behaviour with TV

21 Comments
Join the Conversation
The Simpsons Movie poster - copyright 2007 Twentieth Century Fox
The Simpsons Movie poster - copyright 2007 Twentieth Century Fox
Violent cartoons and TV programs encourage aggressive behaviour in pre-teen boys, says new study from the Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute.

A new report published in the November issue of Pediatrics shows a causal link between violence in children's programming and subsequent violent behaviour in children.

"Parents have been socialized to think that cartoon violence is harmless, but it's not," says report co-author Dr. Dimitri Christakis. "Speaking broadly, the link between on-screen violence and subsequent violent behavior is as strong as evidence that smoking causes lung cancer."

Dr. Christakis and Frederick Zimmerman, PhD, both of Seattle Children’s Hospital Research Institute and the University of Washington School of Medicine, wrote the article, which is titled “Violent Television Viewing During Preschool is Associated with Anti-social Behavior During School Age.”

The study reviewed data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, which studied 8,000 U.S. families for 40 years.

One Hour of Violent TV = 3x Increased Aggression

In the study, parents of 184 boys and 146 girls aged 2 to 5 tracked what their children watched, and reported anti-social behaviour in their offsprings' later years: behaviour which included cheating, being mean, disobedience, destructiveness, and demonstrating a lack of remorse for their actions.

The researchers discovered that, for every hour that children watched violent programming in their pre-school years, their aggression increased threefold when they were aged 7 to 10.

“These findings are a bit unnerving because we know from other studies that the behaviors children manifest in early childhood track into adolescence and even into adulthood,” said Christakis. “As children grow older they gradually learn coping skills to deal with difficult situations, so it’s important to provide positive role models for them at a young age.”

However, this was only the case for boys: girls appeared impervious to violence on TV, whatever they watched. Christakis wants to study the girls' findings more closely, but for now he attributes it to the possibility that boys are biologically more prone to aggression, along with the fact that girls learn different social norms for their behaviour.

Power Rangers, Star Wars Encourages Violence; Toy Story Doesn't

Television programs such as televised football and ice hockey matches, plus many cartoons and movies with titles like Power Rangers, Star Wars, Space Jam and Spider-Man were classified as violent entertainment. These shows depict characters fighting or fleeing from violence, rejoicing in violent acts, and depicting more violence than a child would ordinarily see.

Christakis especially called out Looney Tunes cartoons in his study, telling the Seattle Post-Intelligencer that, by encouraging them to watch such violent cartoons, "You are actually teaching [children] that violence is funny."

Interestingly enough, those classic Looney Tunes cartoons were never originally intended for a children's audience. They were originally placed in front of feature films in movie theatres that showed mainstream movies like Captain Blood or Casablanca.

The report classified such films and programs like Rugrats, The Flintstones and Pixar's classic movie Toy Story as non-violent programming. A third category of educational programming was also reviewed, which featured shows like Barney, Sesame Street, Magic School Bus and Winnie-the-Pooh. Children only exhibited increased aggressive behaviour after watching the violent shows.

Educational Shows Don't Encourage Violence . . .

“This new study provides further evidence of how important and powerful television and media are as young children develop,” said report co-author Dr. Dimitri Christakis. “However, the news here is not all bad. While we found that shows like violent cartoons or football can make children more aggressive, we found no such effect for other programs such as educational ones. This points out that parents must be informed and very selective when making media choices for their children.”

. . . But Educational Shows, DVD's Aren't So Educational

Christakis and his co-author, Frederick Zimmerman, were previously known for writing a study which discovered that infants who watched educational baby videos, such as Brainy Baby,actually had smaller vocabularies than those who didn't. The Walt Disney Company, who produce and distribute Baby Einstein DVDs and other educational products, called the study misleading and unreliable and demanded that the University of Washington retract a news release on it. The university refused.

“We now recognize that content is key,” said Christakis about his new study. “Given the media saturated world that young children now inhabit, we need further research and policies to ensure that media exerts a positive influence on children.”

Dominic von Riedemann, by Brian Tao

Dominic von Riedemann - Dominic is the Animated Film Feature Writer, and winner of 11 Suite 101 Editors' Choice Awards.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 4+0?
21 Comments

Comments

Nov 14, 2008 5:58 AM
Guest :
One of my comments is a cartoon I used to watch back in middle school called "Invader Zim" and they cancelled it when I was in the 7th grade. Sometimes I wish they can bring the show back, but what they show on it, kids may think aliens will turn their hamsters into giant monsters or they'll be afraid of Santa Claus on Christmas or monsters on Halloween. The point is it may be funny, but they did some pretty obsessive things on that show. If it does come back to television one day, I think parents should block it from their kids until they're a little bit older to see an alien disguised as a human planning to take over the world.
Nov 23, 2008 1:05 PM
Guest :
I tend to believe that we as parents need to edit what it is that we are allowing our children to watch. What you see and hear and what it is that they are getting out of it are 2 different things. I know that we let my older son watch only things that we non violent and now we have a 2 year old and it seems that he picks up on everything possibly violent. I know that when we watch Legend as a family thinking that it would be fine but the truth is that he is not rawring at everyone and he even bit me. So does it effect the children. yes! I believe that we as parents just need to watch what they watch and if there is violence then we need to change the channel or put on something that we know is safe.
Apr 3, 2009 8:32 AM
Guest :
So did they find the brain chemistry that isolates girls? Some social influence? Or shall we chalk up one hour of a kid life to their entire makeup? If you watch sad stories (Bambi?) do girls get mushy? Do boys play nice? Was this effect true for 100% of all boys? Could it be that a good story pumps up endorphins and imagination, and reduces inhibitions (think alcohol) and folks will tend to do more of what they may be preconditioned by society to do?

This type of study is way to quick to cause corollaries... I don't think Dahmer was into action adventure much as a young kid. He killed men, often gay, to snuggle. Sure make some headlines and try to promote your bend, but along the way try to separate 'study' from situation. Perhaps describe the methodology a touch, and not go for the easy conclusion?
Apr 4, 2009 12:28 PM
Guest :
I have to say that my younger child (3.5ys) has watched more violent television (Pokemon, Star Wars, Ben 10, etc.) at a younger age than his older brother (7ys) -- mostly as a result of HAVING an older brother who was watching such things -- and he DOES tend to be more aggressive and violent... but I wonder if to some extent this is the result of trying to hold his own with that same older brother. I'm sure there's also a correlation between young children who watch more violent programming and their position as younger siblings as well. Not sure which is the more likely causal factor. (And it's also true that my older child was more easy going from day one than his younger brother. The younger one has been the more willful and aggressive of the two since long before he'd seen ANY television -- certainly any Y7+ material).
Apr 27, 2009 6:53 PM
Guest :
The article describes the research as showing a "causal" link between the viewing of violent tv and aggressive behavior, but in fact the study does not establish this at all. It only establishes that there is a link, which may be non-causal. The cause may be something else entirely, such as witnessing violent behavior in the home, or parental aggression outside the home to others. Has anyone stopped to check whether these kids who watched a lot of tv and statistically were prone to violent behavior also happened to come from deprived or broken homes? This seems almost too obvious to overlook but it's another example of how statistics can be manipulated to 'prove' just about anything.
May 2, 2009 7:30 AM
Guest :
okay so here's the deal. you people are only considering one SINGLE factor, in a world of madness. Television and the media have an effect on behavior in every aspect. somebody below me mentioned that girls get mushy during sad movies, and boys get pumped up from watching "violent" cartoons. but at what point does the parent have to step in and teach the kids the difference between reality and a cartoon? isn't it up to the parents to take control of the way their kids behave and ultimately teach them the difference between right and wrong? at what point do we stop blaming our surroundings and start taking some responsibility for our own actions? Yes, cartoons may tend to be on the more violent side, but they are still funny, no? jare you going to try and tell me that you've never sat down and seen the roadrunner drop an anvil on the wiley coyotes head and laughed about it? IT'S FUNNY, PEOPLE!! fbut CLEARLY no body's going to go dropping anvils on people's heads just not how the real world works. and if we do immitate this behavior that we've seen on a CARTOON (HENSE THE NAME...CARTOON...IT'S NOT REALITY) , we know that there are reprocussions to our actions, and this leads me back to knowing and teaching the difference between right and wrong, as well as reality and fantasty.CASE aAND POINT.
May 26, 2009 12:08 PM
Guest :
To look at only one factor ("among a world of madness" as one commenter put it), is practically the definition of a scientific study. It would be interesting to look at what other factors would do to these results, but that is not, and probably never was the point. As a parent, I try to be very careful about showing my 4 and 1 year olds violent stuff. This is largely self-defense though. When they see violent stuff (loony tunes, new batman cartoons, superman movies) they get crazy, parrot the behaviors, and have nightmares. When the programming is removed, they return to "normal". When I hear people disregard the results of a study like this I tend to think that what they're really saying is: I've shown my kids things others might called "violent", but the egghead experts just call this a casual connection so that can't be the real reason my kids act out and have bad dreams. It could be a million other things. Well, you're right, it could be. But the violet expose probably has more than a casual connection, and you know it.
Oct 19, 2009 6:23 PM
Guest :
god you know what all these people can blame cartoons from today but they grew up watching much worse so does that mean there violent?

p.s we learn right from wrong but hey its much easier to blame t.v i guess,if you dont want your child watching it hen don't let them watch it don't get mad at the show
Oct 21, 2009 10:52 AM
Guest :
i am doing a report on the controversies of looney toons and i like this article becuz it gives me some information about the affects of violent cartoons
Dec 11, 2009 6:17 AM
Guest :
that i understand their al some cartoons that are reall bad for old or young kids should not watch
Jan 21, 2010 9:47 AM
Guest :
FALSE
Jan 22, 2010 5:41 AM
Guest :
umm,,,, this is a attracting point where we should definitly have a look
Feb 18, 2010 4:26 AM
Guest :
I don't really know, i don't want to be a guy that wants to take away fun from the children but i think that new cartoons like ben10, pokemons, naruto are causing violence, and good old cartoons like dexter's laboratory, ed, edd n eddy are only at 6am or 23 pm, that's stupid, I'm 15 and i see younger kids saying something like, use your watch to activate power and then they're fighting.
When i was younger I only watched cartoons like johnny bravo, ed, edd and eddy, dexter's laboratory, and i've stopped watching them when all this new sh*t came out.
Mar 9, 2010 7:55 AM
Guest :
We shouldn't need proof for this. Is it not common sense that if people watch violent things, they are affected? It's like comparing someone who lived in Darfur, in the middle of the genocide, to someone who has grown up among some peaceful group of monks in an isolated monastery. Who's going to be more violent? Watson put it well, "Give me a dozen healthy infants, wll-formed, and my own special world to bring them up in and I'll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select--doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief, and yes, even beggar-man and thief, regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations and race of his ancestor."
When I was five, six, I loved loony tunes and Ben and Jerry. I rewatched them recently, and I was discusted. The violence showed in these cartoons was more offensive than regular adult movies. Why? Because the regular adult movies, like Legend, or Spiderman, don't exonify violence as halarious. It was vulgar to watch these shows that kids watch and have them just as violent as a movie an adult watches. Children don't think when they're watching a show that it is only a show, and it doesn't happen in "real life." They see it, and they imitate it. It becomes a part of them if they watch it too much.
I agree that it is not just movies. It is our society as a whole. The tv is just the pinnacle of the iceberg. I also agree that we cannot just sit back and wait for someone to change the world for us. It is up to us.
Mar 29, 2010 8:51 AM
Guest :
These articles are really stupid. None of them prove anything. It'd be the parents fault for letting their kids become violent and mean. Learn how to raise a kid. People should know the difference between right and wrong. Not that violence is funny and lets go out and kill people and laugh.
Apr 29, 2010 12:23 AM
Guest :
I think also that this is ridiculous. I grew up on cartoons like Popeye, Tom&Jerry, and other cartoons and I admit there are some violent actions in it but I don't or didn't what people, Jerry and all those cartoons characters does. I dont care if it affected me or not. I just care about my future kids. I dont want them to be behaving badly. So I will do what whatever I can anyways even though I find this study, ridiculous. Beware for your kids or future kids people!
May 4, 2010 6:42 AM
Guest :
This article is totally wrong. TV ratings are here for a reason. Do not blame the TV, blame the parents.
May 18, 2010 6:52 AM
Guest :
As a teenager, I grew up watching cartoons like tom and jerry, looney toons, popeye, and all those others that have all the cartoon violence. I watched them almost every day and I know many other people who have watched them every day. Not one of them are violent and neither am I. I also have several cousins and I am around them all the time. I have seen the effects of these cartoons first hand and I think that it's just because they're kids. kids are already hyper because they have so much energy. when they sit down and watch these cartoons for various reasons (sometimes parents just need a break and let their kids watch this so they can rest for a few minutes. I know mine did) the energy inside of them just builds up and when they finish watching these cartoons the energy gets free and lets loose. If they watch something like educational stuff that most kids hear everyday from school and such, they get bored and usually tired. most kids won't even sit in front of the tv for 5 minutes before they get bored and wander off. I believe that as they get older, they will grow out of it and act as normal, non-violent teens. I also believe some of the reasons are most likely linked to the parents disiplinary actions at home. "disobedience," "destructiveness," most of these examples that they are talking about in this article about how it affects kids can also be linked to little or no disipline at home. I think parents should take responsibility for their own actions and if they don't want their kids watching this kind of stuff, don't let them watch it until they are old enough to understand exactly what their watching. I have also seen some of the cartoons that they use to show and they are almost twice as bad as what they were showing in the 90's. Cartoons are suppose to be something that older kids can come home and unwind from school and get a break from reality for half an hour or so so they won't be as stressed. sometimes, the only comic relief in some peoples lives
Jul 5, 2010 6:38 PM
Guest :
If your kid bites someone or attacks someone your going to blame TV?! That's dumb. It's the parents job to teach them how to be normal, if your child is crazy don't cry that the TV did it when you know it is your own fault. It's all about disipline. TV doesn't make kids violent. The shows that used to be on (Power Rangers, DBZ, Gundam, Zoids, Max Steel, Thundercats) were all violent but who cares. We watched them because they were cool and interesting. These cartoon also gave imagination which kids lack today from their dumb cartoons like Flapjack and Fanboy and Chumchum or whatever the heck they're called. That is becasue the old cartoons had a story and plot. And they also taught you something... if you decide to be a bad guy and go and attack/ kill people, you will most likely be killed for doing bad things. They also show that protecting the ones you care about no matter what is important, which Flapjack, fanboy, and chumchum will never teach anyone. Examples would be Naruto, Samuria Jack, and all of the others I listed.
Apr 13, 2011 1:58 PM
Guest :
um people need to do more research and under stand statistics are easy manipulated very few peer reviewed scholarly articles agree with this point.
Aug 25, 2011 9:39 AM
Guest :
I would have to agree i make this point to everyone i know that allows their childern to watch violent cartooons
21 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement